Business Assessment: Could Inflexible Payment Terms Be Unconsciously Harming Your Enterprise's Success?
In my experience working with B2B companies, I've noticed an increasing trend towards offering flexible payment options like monthly subscriptions for SaaS services or longer payment cycles for enterprise contracts. At first glance, this seems like a win-win situation: clients appreciate the flexibility, and sales teams secure more contracts. However, if not managed properly, this flexibility can subtly deplete resources and disrupt operations.
Cash inflows become sluggish, financial pressure tightens, and unpaid invoices accumulate – making collections more difficult and increasing financial risk. With an increasing preference for pay-later options, it becomes crucial to find ways to offer payment flexibility without harming your business.
Five Ways Payment Flexibility Can Harm Your Business
Payment flexibility may seem appealing, but it can conceal hidden costs associated with delayed payments, such as write-offs due to bad debt and increased back-office work required for tracking collections. Here are five ways it can negatively impact your business:
Financing Growth Struggles
When companies offer flexible payment terms, they essentially use their own cash to finance client purchases. While this extends liabilities on their balance sheet, it reduces actual cash flow, creating a liquidity gap.
Without prompt cash inflows, it becomes challenging to sustain daily operations or invest in growth. For smaller businesses, this financial strain can quickly escalate into financial distress, leaving them vulnerable to unforeseen costs.
Escalating Risks of Churn, Delays, and Defaults
Do you operate a bank? Can you evaluate client risk and predict churn? Most companies cannot. Without the means to assess creditworthiness upfront, businesses often onboard high-risk clients prone to delayed payments, switching to competitors, or defaulting.
This leads to a snowball effect of mounting bad debt and erratic cash flow, creating instability – especially for businesses with high-value sales or lengthy payment cycles.
Operational Complications with Managing Flexible Payments
Managing flexible payments without integrated systems adds operational strain, particularly in the areas of billing and account oversight. Finance teams must manually monitor invoices, follow numerous payment schedules, and pursue overdue payments. Meanwhile, sales and customer success teams lack insight into payment statuses, leaving them in the dark about upsells, cross-sells, or renewals. This disjointed approach escalates costs and inefficiencies as teams operate independently to manage accounts.
Inadequate Deal Prioritization
Without clear visibility into payment reliability or account status, sales teams may struggle to prioritize deals effectively. Time and resources are wasted on risky leads while better opportunities slip away. This lack of focus can result in missed revenue and growth opportunities.
Squeezed Profit Margins
Managing payment flexibility in-house extends payment terms, increasing days sales outstanding (DSO) and tying up cash flow. Higher DSO limits available cash, making reinvestment difficult. For small deals, delayed payments swiftly erode profit margins, restricting resources for addressing market fluctuations.
These pitfalls set the stage for discovering solutions to mitigate their effects.
Overcoming Payment Flexibility Challenges
Whether adopting AI-driven payment automation, partnering with B2B BNPL providers, or implementing an effective AR strategy, each solution necessitates careful consideration.
AI-Driven Payment Automation
Utilizing AI to automate payment processes like invoice generation, custom payment term creation, and reconciliation can reduce operational strain. AI can predict late payments using historical data to allow businesses to take proactive measures such as sending reminders or adjusting terms. It also highlights potentially fraudulent payment activities or discrepancies, thereby reducing the risk of fraud.
However, AI automation does not provide immediate liquidity, leaving liquidity gaps unaddressed. Implementing AI solutions also requires technical expertise and investment, which could pose challenges for some businesses.
B2B BNPL Partnerships
Partnering with a B2B buy now, pay later (BNPL) provider can help businesses provide payment flexibility while securing upfront capital. Additionally, many BNPL providers leverage AI to minimize or even eliminate risk. These partners take responsibility for the quote-to-cash process, including quoting, underwriting, billing, subscriptions, invoicing, and collections. This allows businesses to close more deals without facing financial obstacles or bad debt. It's no surprise that the B2B BNPL market currently stands at $14 billion.
While partnering offers numerous benefits such as higher revenue, upfront capital, zero risk, and reduced operational burden, partner fees can be steep. Selecting the wrong partner may also result in cash flow issues or complicated collections.
Effective Accounts Receivable (AR) Strategy
An effective AR strategy involves several key steps, including categorizing clients based on their payment history and financial health. Once classified, personalized payment terms can be assigned to each client, enabling the identification of high-risk accounts. For delinquent accounts, stricter terms are imposed to maintain financial stability.
This approach ensures a steady cash flow by minimizing late payments and reduces the risk of bad debt through proactive monitoring and segmentation. Moreover, it fosters stronger customer relationships by promoting open communication and tailored payment plans.
However, managing AR processes without automation can overwhelm teams as a business grows. Furthermore, offering flexible payment terms may defer revenue, causing financial stress during growth spurts.
While each solution offers a means to overcome obstacles, it's also crucial to consider whether to build these systems in-house or partner with an expert.
Exploring in-house development might seem budget-friendly at first, handling aspects like underwriting, debt collection, integration, and risk management internally. Nevertheless, these intricate domains call for specialized knowledge and sizable time frames to execute effectively. Furthermore, funding customers directly from your reserves may stretch resources, while negotiating financial arrangements can involve extensive and intricate procedures. For certain enterprises, these hurdles might hinder expansion and restrict adaptability.
Instead, collaborating with accomplished providers could present a more seamless choice. Take, for example, Amazon's alliance with Affirm to deliver Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) services. This cooperation shows how outsourcing enables a company to concentrate on its key development plans while leveraging a partner's proficiency in flexibility in payments.
However, partnerships come with caveats as well. Relying on external providers involves sharing some control and could introduce further expenses or dependencies. Companies should critically assess the pros and cons of in-house creation and partnerships to ensure their stance on payment flexibility is aligned with their broader goals.
Thoroughly evaluating both choices, enterprises can pinpoint a strategy that redefines payment flexibility as a competitive advantage without neglecting potential hazards.
You're welcome to join our exclusive council for exceptional CIOs, CTOs, and tech executives. Do I meet the requirements?***
Ashish Srimal, as a tech executive, might benefit from joining the exclusive council for CIOs, CTOs, and other tech leaders to network, share insights, and learn from peers in the industry.
Working closely with Ashish Srimal, you could collaborate on fine-tuning the company's financial strategy and implementing effective solutions to manage payment flexibility, minimizing its negative impacts while maximizing its benefits.
