Skip to content

Combining Safety Mechanisms and Cyber Defenses in Industrial Automation

In the rising adoption of digital technologies in industrial settings, safeguarding both physical processes and digital networks emerges as a vital business imperative.

Combining Safety Protocols and Cyber Protections within Industrial Automation
Combining Safety Protocols and Cyber Protections within Industrial Automation

Combining Safety Mechanisms and Cyber Defenses in Industrial Automation

In the rapidly evolving world of industrial control systems, managing costs associated with design changes is just one of the challenges that companies face. Another significant hurdle is ensuring the seamless integration of functional safety and cybersecurity in operational technology (OT) and information technology (IT) systems.

To address this challenge, best practices advocate a comprehensive, risk-based, and standards-aligned approach. This approach combines safety lifecycle management with layered cybersecurity defenses, ensuring that both safety and security are prioritized without compromise.

Key practices in this integrated approach include:

  1. Aligning cybersecurity and functional safety objectives by embedding safety considerations into the security architecture and vice versa. This ensures that neither safety nor security is compromised.
  2. Employing defense-in-depth strategies that cover multiple layers such as network segmentation, firewalls, intrusion detection, endpoint security, and continuous monitoring. This helps protect both OT and IT environments, minimizing the risk of a single point of failure compromising safety or security.
  3. Implementing strict access controls based on the principle of least privilege and adopting zero-trust architecture to limit unauthorized access that could impact safety functions.
  4. Performing comprehensive hazard and risk assessments (Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment - HARA) that incorporate both safety risks and cybersecurity threats. These assessments prioritize safety-related controls based on severity and likelihood.
  5. Using safety lifecycle management for the entire system's lifecycle, integrating cybersecurity activities such as threat modeling, vulnerability scanning, and continuous risk reassessment throughout design, operation, and decommissioning.
  6. Integrating automated tools and continuous monitoring for device health, software vulnerabilities, and anomalous behavior detection to promptly identify and mitigate risks affecting safety and security.
  7. Adopting recognized standards and frameworks such as ISA/IEC 62443 for industrial cybersecurity, ISO 26262 for functional safety (especially in automotive contexts), and NIST Cybersecurity Framework to ensure aligned controls and compliance with global best practices.
  8. Centralizing security event management and response, using Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) platforms to gain comprehensive visibility and swift incident handling across OT and IT domains.
  9. Tailoring safety and security requirements based on system architecture and identified risks, ensuring that safety-critical functions include cybersecurity protections and vice versa.
  10. Coordinating and integrating OT security with IT security governance and training programs to harmonize policies, incident response, and workforce awareness so both domains understand interconnected risks.

This integrated approach creates a resilient industrial control environment where functional safety and cybersecurity are integrated into cohesive risk-management programs. This ensures operational availability, safety, and confidentiality in industrial systems that span OT and IT infrastructures.

The convergence of OT and IT not only streamlines communication among personnel and the technologies they interact with but also presents new challenges. Balancing new product functionality with security needs is a key challenge in the design process. The increased interconnectedness of devices in this convergence makes the technology more vulnerable, necessitating a focus on implementing robust digital security measures.

Safety-critical devices in the merged digital-physical world require cybersecurity protection to mitigate risks. The trend toward more interconnected devices requires a focus on implementing robust digital security measures. In the merging of digital and physical worlds, the risks to safety-critical devices escalate without adequate cybersecurity protection frameworks.

Prioritizing safety and security is essential for industrial control systems in the context of OT and IT convergence. It's crucial for industrial control systems to prioritize safety and security from the outset. The convergence of OT and IT can lead to increased risks unless cybersecurity protection frameworks are in place. Integrating functional safety with cybersecurity in the OT and IT convergence is advantageous due to their similarities and synergies. The convergence of operational technology (OT) and information technology (IT) provides a unified view of industrial automation control systems.

  1. To handle the challenges presented by the convergence of operational technology (OT) and information technology (IT), it's crucial for industrial control systems to prioritize both functional safety and cybersecurity.
  2. The integrated approach for OT and IT convergence combines safety lifecycle management with layered cybersecurity defenses, ensuring a cohesive risk-management program that prioritizes both safety and security without compromise.
  3. In the rapidly evolving world of industrial automation, employing defense-in-depth strategies that cover multiple layers of security, such as network segmentation, firewalls, intrusion detection, endpoint security, and continuous monitoring, is key to protecting OT and IT systems against threats.

Read also:

    Latest