Skip to content

KaOne deal hindered by InnBucks, additional withdrawal fee imposed alongside regular monthly charge

Mobile Money Giant InnBucks in Zimbabwe Switches to Subscription Service Dubbed KaOne

KaOne's agreement with InnBucks crumbles; user now faces an additional withdrawal fee alongside...
KaOne's agreement with InnBucks crumbles; user now faces an additional withdrawal fee alongside regular monthly charge

KaOne deal hindered by InnBucks, additional withdrawal fee imposed alongside regular monthly charge

In the digital age, mobile money platforms have become an integral part of everyday life in Zimbabwe. Two of the most popular services are InnBucks and EcoCash, but a clear understanding of their transaction fee structures and cost comparisons for heavy users remains elusive.

Historically, EcoCash has operated on a tiered fee structure, with fees depending on the amount transferred and the type of transaction. These charges can accumulate significantly for frequent users, often leading to the search for alternative or complementary solutions.

In contrast, InnBucks, a relatively new digital currency platform, is marketed as a low-fee or fee-free alternative for digital transactions, particularly for intra-platform payments. However, the exact current fee structures for InnBucks, including per-transaction or monthly use fees, are not publicly detailed or widely published.

Under the old model, users paid a certain percentage of the transaction value when sending or withdrawing money. With the introduction of the hybrid model, InnBucks moved to a subscription model, making it more cost-effective for heavy users. The new cash withdrawal fee under the hybrid model is 1%.

The hybrid model, named KaOne, initially offered free unlimited transactions for a monthly fee of $1. However, it has since reintroduced a 1% cash withdrawal fee. Under the new model, all other transactions continue to be covered by the monthly fee of $1.

Comparing the two services for heavy users, EcoCash fees can become substantial with frequent or large transactions due to tiered per-transaction charges. InnBucks, on the other hand, is designed to be more cost-effective, potentially with lower or no transaction fees.

For instance, if sending $100 through InnBucks, the fee would be approximately $2.01, while sending the same amount through EcoCash would incur a fee of approximately $4.13. The next time a user sends money with InnBucks in the same month, the charge would drop to $1 (just the 1% fee), while EcoCash would still be $4.13.

InnBucks, a major mobile money player in Zimbabwe, has transitioned to the KaOne hybrid model, which remains cheaper for heavy users compared to standard transaction fees in the market. However, without explicit up-to-date public fee breakdowns for both services, detailed numeric fee comparisons are not currently available from the search results.

For exact current fee tables, consulting official platforms or service providers’ latest fee schedules directly would be necessary. It is essential for users to make informed decisions about their digital transactions, and understanding the fee structures of mobile money services is a crucial part of that process.

  1. Despite offering lower or no transaction fees, InnBucks' exact current fee structures, including per-transaction and monthly use fees, are not publicly detailed or widely published, similar to EcoCash's transaction fee structures.
  2. For heavy mobile money users, InnBucks, with its hybrid KaOne model, remains cheaper compared to standard transaction fees in Zimbabwe's market, but without explicit up-to-date public fee breakdowns for both services, a detailed numeric comparison of fees between InnBucks and EcoCash is not currently available.

Read also:

    Latest